<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 754 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217816</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment under section 147, supporting the disallowance of depreciation on leased assets due to sham transactions aimed at claiming undue tax benefits. The Tribunal found the lease and sale back transactions to be colorable and not genuine operating leases. The issue of tax treatment of lease rentals was remanded for reconsideration. The reassessment was deemed valid, rejecting arguments of merger with the CIT(A)&#039;s order. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 18:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 754 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217816</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment under section 147, supporting the disallowance of depreciation on leased assets due to sham transactions aimed at claiming undue tax benefits. The Tribunal found the lease and sale back transactions to be colorable and not genuine operating leases. The issue of tax treatment of lease rentals was remanded for reconsideration. The reassessment was deemed valid, rejecting arguments of merger with the CIT(A)&#039;s order. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>