<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 733 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217795</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the dropped demand of duty, interest, and penalty based on related party transactions under the Central Excise Act was dismissed. The Tribunal found that the companies involved were not evading duty by selling goods at lower prices, as they were selling to independent buyers at comparable rates. The presence of common directors did not imply an interest in each other&#039;s business, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 733 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217795</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the dropped demand of duty, interest, and penalty based on related party transactions under the Central Excise Act was dismissed. The Tribunal found that the companies involved were not evading duty by selling goods at lower prices, as they were selling to independent buyers at comparable rates. The presence of common directors did not imply an interest in each other&#039;s business, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>