https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217784 The Full Bench affirmed that the High Court can correct jurisdictional errors under Article 226 and maintained that appeals under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent are maintainable if the petition justifies invoking Article 226. The judgment emphasized a liberal interpretation of constitutional provisions to uphold justice and prevent appeal rights deprivation based on technicalities. The principles established guide the assessment of the invoked jurisdiction's nature and the appeal's maintainability, ensuring justice within the constitutional framework. en-us Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217784 The Full Bench affirmed that the High Court can correct jurisdictional errors under Article 226 and maintained that appeals under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent are maintainable if the petition justifies invoking Article 226. The judgment emphasized a liberal interpretation of constitutional provisions to uphold justice and prevent appeal rights deprivation based on technicalities. The principles established guide the assessment of the invoked jurisdiction's nature and the appeal's maintainability, ensuring justice within the constitutional framework. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217784