<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 721 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217783</link>
    <description>The court quashed the direction for a special audit and all subsequent proceedings due to procedural lapses, lack of proper application of mind by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (CCIT), and failure to comply with principles of natural justice. The writ petition was allowed in favor of the petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in construction and real estate, challenging the validity of the show cause notice under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2013 13:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 721 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217783</link>
      <description>The court quashed the direction for a special audit and all subsequent proceedings due to procedural lapses, lack of proper application of mind by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (CCIT), and failure to comply with principles of natural justice. The writ petition was allowed in favor of the petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in construction and real estate, challenging the validity of the show cause notice under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>