<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 719 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217781</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s failure to declare a receipt as income in the return constituted furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, attracting penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The first appellate order deleting the penalty was set aside, and the penalty of Rs. 1,43,33,963/- was reinstated. The revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, with the decision pronounced on 15/10/2012.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 719 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217781</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s failure to declare a receipt as income in the return constituted furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, attracting penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The first appellate order deleting the penalty was set aside, and the penalty of Rs. 1,43,33,963/- was reinstated. The revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, with the decision pronounced on 15/10/2012.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>