<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 700 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217762</link>
    <description>Under Section 108 of the Customs Act, the Court permitted the petitioner&#039;s counsel to remain present during interrogation at a visible distance but beyond audibility, relying on its earlier similar orders. The petitioner was required to appear whenever called and cooperate with the customs investigation, so the protection granted was limited to counsel&#039;s presence without interfering in questioning.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 700 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217762</link>
      <description>Under Section 108 of the Customs Act, the Court permitted the petitioner&#039;s counsel to remain present during interrogation at a visible distance but beyond audibility, relying on its earlier similar orders. The petitioner was required to appear whenever called and cooperate with the customs investigation, so the protection granted was limited to counsel&#039;s presence without interfering in questioning.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>