<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 691 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217753</link>
    <description>The court rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the decision setting aside the confiscation order and redemption fine of Rs. 1 lakh due to a default in duty payment. The judgment emphasized that confiscation and fines are only applicable when goods have been seized and released provisionally after bond execution. The ruling clarified that if the fine is paid, the goods must be returned, in line with legal provisions and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 691 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217753</link>
      <description>The court rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the decision setting aside the confiscation order and redemption fine of Rs. 1 lakh due to a default in duty payment. The judgment emphasized that confiscation and fines are only applicable when goods have been seized and released provisionally after bond execution. The ruling clarified that if the fine is paid, the goods must be returned, in line with legal provisions and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>