<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 690 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217752</link>
    <description>The Court partially allowed the petition, dismissing time-barred claims and remanding claims within the limitation period for reconsideration based on substantive compliance with rules and notifications. The Court emphasized the importance of meeting mandatory requirements for refund claims and directed a re-examination by the Revisional Authority focusing on substantive compliance with rules and notifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 690 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217752</link>
      <description>The Court partially allowed the petition, dismissing time-barred claims and remanding claims within the limitation period for reconsideration based on substantive compliance with rules and notifications. The Court emphasized the importance of meeting mandatory requirements for refund claims and directed a re-examination by the Revisional Authority focusing on substantive compliance with rules and notifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>