<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 680 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217742</link>
    <description>The Court addressed issues including the maintainability of a special leave petition (SLP) against a High Court order, applicability of res-judicata and merger doctrine in review petitions, and the interpretation of Article 136 of the Constitution. Conflicting views on filing review petitions after SLP dismissals were noted, emphasizing the need for clarity. The Court highlighted the discretionary powers under Article 136 and the considerations of statutory appeal rights in relation to res-judicata and merger principles. The matter was referred to a larger Bench for a definitive decision to resolve discrepancies and provide guidance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 16:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 680 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217742</link>
      <description>The Court addressed issues including the maintainability of a special leave petition (SLP) against a High Court order, applicability of res-judicata and merger doctrine in review petitions, and the interpretation of Article 136 of the Constitution. Conflicting views on filing review petitions after SLP dismissals were noted, emphasizing the need for clarity. The Court highlighted the discretionary powers under Article 136 and the considerations of statutory appeal rights in relation to res-judicata and merger principles. The matter was referred to a larger Bench for a definitive decision to resolve discrepancies and provide guidance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>