<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 671 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217733</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s grounds challenging the assessment under Section 144 and upheld the addition of Rs. 12,99,850 under Section 68 for unexplained cash deposits. The case was remanded to the Assessing Officer for the appellant to establish the connection between business receipts and cash deposits. The appeal was partially allowed for statistical purposes, with instructions for the AO to issue orders based on the evidence presented by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 671 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217733</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s grounds challenging the assessment under Section 144 and upheld the addition of Rs. 12,99,850 under Section 68 for unexplained cash deposits. The case was remanded to the Assessing Officer for the appellant to establish the connection between business receipts and cash deposits. The appeal was partially allowed for statistical purposes, with instructions for the AO to issue orders based on the evidence presented by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>