<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 655 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217717</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the contract between the gas suppliers and the assessee was for the sale of goods, not a work contract. Consequently, Section 194C of the Income Tax Act did not apply. The court found that the Tribunal&#039;s order was legally sound and correctly interpreted the contract and relevant legal provisions, dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 655 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217717</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the contract between the gas suppliers and the assessee was for the sale of goods, not a work contract. Consequently, Section 194C of the Income Tax Act did not apply. The court found that the Tribunal&#039;s order was legally sound and correctly interpreted the contract and relevant legal provisions, dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>