<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 649 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217711</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order in a case involving time-barred review applications, alleged misdeclarations by importers, and the requirement of a license for importing old clothing. The Tribunal remanded the case for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for a fair hearing for both parties and thorough examination of all relevant aspects. It criticized the Commissioner (Appeals) for unwarranted comments and directed a re-examination of the matter with judicial restraint and dignified language.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 00:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 649 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217711</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order in a case involving time-barred review applications, alleged misdeclarations by importers, and the requirement of a license for importing old clothing. The Tribunal remanded the case for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for a fair hearing for both parties and thorough examination of all relevant aspects. It criticized the Commissioner (Appeals) for unwarranted comments and directed a re-examination of the matter with judicial restraint and dignified language.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>