<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 646 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217708</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case concerning the interpretation of Regulation 7 of the Project Import Regulations, 1986. The Court ruled in favor of the respondent, stating that the absence of an Installation Certificate does not impact eligibility for the concessional rate of duty. The judgment clarified that Regulation 7 does not explicitly require an Installation Certificate and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, finding no substantial question of law. The decision settled the dispute in favor of the respondent, affirming their position regarding the interpretation of the regulation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 00:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 646 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217708</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case concerning the interpretation of Regulation 7 of the Project Import Regulations, 1986. The Court ruled in favor of the respondent, stating that the absence of an Installation Certificate does not impact eligibility for the concessional rate of duty. The judgment clarified that Regulation 7 does not explicitly require an Installation Certificate and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, finding no substantial question of law. The decision settled the dispute in favor of the respondent, affirming their position regarding the interpretation of the regulation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>