<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 635 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217697</link>
    <description>The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement and proceeded to decide the appeal in favor of the appellants. However, the case was remanded for verification of facts regarding the charges collected by the appellants to determine if service tax had already been paid by MCX. The stay petition and appeal were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 635 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217697</link>
      <description>The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement and proceeded to decide the appeal in favor of the appellants. However, the case was remanded for verification of facts regarding the charges collected by the appellants to determine if service tax had already been paid by MCX. The stay petition and appeal were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>