<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 629 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217691</link>
    <description>At the show-cause stage, a noticee has no automatic right to obtain internal or inter-departmental investigative communications where the notice rests on disclosed material. The court found that the show-cause notice was based on bank records and information obtained from the petitioner&#039;s bankers, and those records had already been supplied. As the refusal concerned only internal correspondence between the investigating agency and the adjudicating authority, and no undisclosed material underpinned the notice, the objection based on natural justice failed. The refusal to furnish the requested internal DRI communications was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 629 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217691</link>
      <description>At the show-cause stage, a noticee has no automatic right to obtain internal or inter-departmental investigative communications where the notice rests on disclosed material. The court found that the show-cause notice was based on bank records and information obtained from the petitioner&#039;s bankers, and those records had already been supplied. As the refusal concerned only internal correspondence between the investigating agency and the adjudicating authority, and no undisclosed material underpinned the notice, the objection based on natural justice failed. The refusal to furnish the requested internal DRI communications was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>