<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 627 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217689</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Company Law Board&#039;s order in a case involving maintainability of a petition under Sections 397/398 of the Companies Act by a majority shareholder. It found that despite being a majority shareholder, the respondent had the statutory right to file the petition. The court applied partnership principles, considering the relationship akin to a partnership. Allegations of oppression and mismanagement were substantiated, justifying relief for the respondent. The court upheld the order directing the purchase of shares, citing the deteriorated relationship and ineffective company management. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Company Law Board&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 627 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217689</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Company Law Board&#039;s order in a case involving maintainability of a petition under Sections 397/398 of the Companies Act by a majority shareholder. It found that despite being a majority shareholder, the respondent had the statutory right to file the petition. The court applied partnership principles, considering the relationship akin to a partnership. Allegations of oppression and mismanagement were substantiated, justifying relief for the respondent. The court upheld the order directing the purchase of shares, citing the deteriorated relationship and ineffective company management. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Company Law Board&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>