<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 619 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217681</link>
    <description>The court allowed both Income Tax Appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee-appellant. It held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s reopening of the assessment under Section 147 was unjustified as it lacked proper grounds and failed to comply with statutory requirements. The court emphasized that relying solely on the incomplete report of the District Valuation Officer without rejecting the books of accounts was erroneous. Consequently, the department was instructed to act in accordance with the court&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 13:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 619 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217681</link>
      <description>The court allowed both Income Tax Appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee-appellant. It held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s reopening of the assessment under Section 147 was unjustified as it lacked proper grounds and failed to comply with statutory requirements. The court emphasized that relying solely on the incomplete report of the District Valuation Officer without rejecting the books of accounts was erroneous. Consequently, the department was instructed to act in accordance with the court&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>