<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 606 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA, HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217668</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the appeal against the addition of income based on the sale of jewellery. The Court considered the genuineness of the sale, evaluating evidence presented by the appellant. Despite the appellant&#039;s documentation, including sale invoices and a valuation report, the Assessing Officer rejected the evidence. The Tribunal questioned the credibility of the evidence, leading to the restoration of the Assessing Officer&#039;s order. The High Court emphasized the principle of not interfering if two plausible views exist, ultimately dismissing the appeal for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 07:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 606 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA, HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217668</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the appeal against the addition of income based on the sale of jewellery. The Court considered the genuineness of the sale, evaluating evidence presented by the appellant. Despite the appellant&#039;s documentation, including sale invoices and a valuation report, the Assessing Officer rejected the evidence. The Tribunal questioned the credibility of the evidence, leading to the restoration of the Assessing Officer&#039;s order. The High Court emphasized the principle of not interfering if two plausible views exist, ultimately dismissing the appeal for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>