<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 589 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217651</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, allowed the Stay Petitions for waiver of ineligible CENVAT Credit, interest, and penalty. The Tribunal found that the issue was narrow, focusing on whether the appellant undertook any activity on the returned goods. As the appellant claimed to have batch records for mixing and packing activities, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for reconsideration by the adjudicating authority, emphasizing adherence to principles of natural justice. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 589 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217651</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, allowed the Stay Petitions for waiver of ineligible CENVAT Credit, interest, and penalty. The Tribunal found that the issue was narrow, focusing on whether the appellant undertook any activity on the returned goods. As the appellant claimed to have batch records for mixing and packing activities, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for reconsideration by the adjudicating authority, emphasizing adherence to principles of natural justice. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>