<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 553 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217615</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision in a case involving misdeclaration in a Bill of Entry, where excess goods were confiscated and penalties imposed under Section 112 of the Customs Act. The Tribunal emphasized the genuine mistake in the filing process, highlighting the correctability of such errors under Section 149. It rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stressing the distinction between bona fide errors and intentional evasion of customs duties, ultimately affirming the Commissioner&#039;s ruling based on the circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 19:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 553 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217615</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision in a case involving misdeclaration in a Bill of Entry, where excess goods were confiscated and penalties imposed under Section 112 of the Customs Act. The Tribunal emphasized the genuine mistake in the filing process, highlighting the correctability of such errors under Section 149. It rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stressing the distinction between bona fide errors and intentional evasion of customs duties, ultimately affirming the Commissioner&#039;s ruling based on the circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>