<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 545 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217607</link>
    <description>The revision application by M/s. Sabare International Ltd. against disallowance of rebate claims and simultaneous availment of Cenvat credit and duty drawback was rejected. The government upheld the decision that allowing both rebate and drawback would result in impermissible double benefit. The applicant&#039;s argument of not availing Cenvat credit was contradicted by evidence showing otherwise. Compliance with rules on claiming rebate and drawback simultaneously was emphasized to prevent unfair advantages.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 545 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217607</link>
      <description>The revision application by M/s. Sabare International Ltd. against disallowance of rebate claims and simultaneous availment of Cenvat credit and duty drawback was rejected. The government upheld the decision that allowing both rebate and drawback would result in impermissible double benefit. The applicant&#039;s argument of not availing Cenvat credit was contradicted by evidence showing otherwise. Compliance with rules on claiming rebate and drawback simultaneously was emphasized to prevent unfair advantages.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>