<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 538 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217600</link>
    <description>The Tribunal vacated the CIT(A)&#039;s findings and directed adherence to Rule 46A of the IT Rules, 1962. The matter was to be disposed of following principles of natural justice, allowing both parties sufficient opportunity. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, dismissing a general ground and no further arguments were presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 538 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217600</link>
      <description>The Tribunal vacated the CIT(A)&#039;s findings and directed adherence to Rule 46A of the IT Rules, 1962. The matter was to be disposed of following principles of natural justice, allowing both parties sufficient opportunity. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, dismissing a general ground and no further arguments were presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>