https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217595 The Tribunal allowed the appeal partially, upholding the enhanced remuneration claim for whole-time directors as the liability crystallized during the relevant year, post-balance sheet date. However, the Provident Fund issue was remitted for further verification by the Assessing Officer regarding the remittance date. The disallowance of the remuneration and Provident Fund contribution was not sustained, with the Tribunal finding the enhanced remuneration justified post-approval. en-us Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217595 The Tribunal allowed the appeal partially, upholding the enhanced remuneration claim for whole-time directors as the liability crystallized during the relevant year, post-balance sheet date. However, the Provident Fund issue was remitted for further verification by the Assessing Officer regarding the remittance date. The disallowance of the remuneration and Provident Fund contribution was not sustained, with the Tribunal finding the enhanced remuneration justified post-approval. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217595