<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 532 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217594</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the disallowance of interest expenditure by the CIT (Appeals). The Tribunal found that the interest payments to loan creditors were not excessive, considering the commercial expediency of placing surplus funds with private parties for higher returns. Additionally, the Tribunal noted the availability of substantial own funds for investments and the absence of evidence suggesting that the loans were funded by interest-bearing funds. Consequently, the appeal and cross-objection were both dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 532 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217594</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the disallowance of interest expenditure by the CIT (Appeals). The Tribunal found that the interest payments to loan creditors were not excessive, considering the commercial expediency of placing surplus funds with private parties for higher returns. Additionally, the Tribunal noted the availability of substantial own funds for investments and the absence of evidence suggesting that the loans were funded by interest-bearing funds. Consequently, the appeal and cross-objection were both dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>