<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 530 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217592</link>
    <description>Cash credits are not excluded from section 68 merely by producing confirmations; the assessee must establish the creditor&#039;s identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the transaction, and unexplained credits may be sustained where the source remains unproved. On the facts noted, some additions were deleted because the assessee discharged the initial onus through confirmations, banking entries and surrounding circumstances, but a large credit was upheld for want of material proving the creditor&#039;s capacity. Interest shown from partnership firms required verification from firm records because the exact amounts brought to tax were not clearly supported, so those additions were remitted for fresh determination. Interest under sections 234B and 234C was consequential to the final assessment outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 530 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217592</link>
      <description>Cash credits are not excluded from section 68 merely by producing confirmations; the assessee must establish the creditor&#039;s identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the transaction, and unexplained credits may be sustained where the source remains unproved. On the facts noted, some additions were deleted because the assessee discharged the initial onus through confirmations, banking entries and surrounding circumstances, but a large credit was upheld for want of material proving the creditor&#039;s capacity. Interest shown from partnership firms required verification from firm records because the exact amounts brought to tax were not clearly supported, so those additions were remitted for fresh determination. Interest under sections 234B and 234C was consequential to the final assessment outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>