<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 507 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217569</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) in deleting various additions made by the Assessing Officer, finding that the expenses were necessary for maintenance and were not capital in nature. The tribunal concluded that the A.O. had made arbitrary additions without proper verification, dismissing the department&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 507 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217569</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) in deleting various additions made by the Assessing Officer, finding that the expenses were necessary for maintenance and were not capital in nature. The tribunal concluded that the A.O. had made arbitrary additions without proper verification, dismissing the department&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>