<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 495 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217557</link>
    <description>The High Court dispensed with the requirement for the Taloja unit to deposit the balance of Rs. 1.93 Crores under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court considered the deposits made by the parties and the Appellant&#039;s undertaking not to claim a refund pending the appeal. The appeal was disposed of, with the High Court directing the Tribunal to expedite the appeal&#039;s disposal within six months from the date of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 495 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217557</link>
      <description>The High Court dispensed with the requirement for the Taloja unit to deposit the balance of Rs. 1.93 Crores under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court considered the deposits made by the parties and the Appellant&#039;s undertaking not to claim a refund pending the appeal. The appeal was disposed of, with the High Court directing the Tribunal to expedite the appeal&#039;s disposal within six months from the date of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>