<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 486 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217548</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the assessee&#039;s claim for labour charges, emphasizing the reasonableness of the expenses based on improved net profit percentage and decreased percentage of labour charges to turnover. Despite the Assessing Officer&#039;s rejection of the accounts, the Tribunal found no justification for disallowing any part of the labour expenses. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the allowance of the labour charges claimed by the assessee. The decision was pronounced on 5th October 2012.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 486 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217548</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the assessee&#039;s claim for labour charges, emphasizing the reasonableness of the expenses based on improved net profit percentage and decreased percentage of labour charges to turnover. Despite the Assessing Officer&#039;s rejection of the accounts, the Tribunal found no justification for disallowing any part of the labour expenses. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the allowance of the labour charges claimed by the assessee. The decision was pronounced on 5th October 2012.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>