<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 480 - ITAT, AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217542</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the ex parte order by CIT(A) due to lack of proper notice and opportunity for the appellant, emphasizing the requirement of reasoned orders and proper service of notices as per sec. 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal directed a fresh disposal of the appeal with sufficient opportunity for both parties. Additionally, the Tribunal highlighted procedural irregularities in estimating income at Rs.3,35,450 without proper consideration of grounds, leading to the decision to set aside the CIT(A) order for reevaluation. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to legal provisions and principles of natural justice for a fair resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 15:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 480 - ITAT, AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217542</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the ex parte order by CIT(A) due to lack of proper notice and opportunity for the appellant, emphasizing the requirement of reasoned orders and proper service of notices as per sec. 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal directed a fresh disposal of the appeal with sufficient opportunity for both parties. Additionally, the Tribunal highlighted procedural irregularities in estimating income at Rs.3,35,450 without proper consideration of grounds, leading to the decision to set aside the CIT(A) order for reevaluation. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to legal provisions and principles of natural justice for a fair resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>