<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 464 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217526</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s and CIT(A)&#039;s findings, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of additions for unexplained cash credits. The Tribunal found the assessee provided necessary details, and creditors confirmed loans in their balance sheets. The appellate authorities noted the AO&#039;s reliance on surmises and lack of adverse material. The decision was based on detailed examination and sound reasoning, aligning with precedents that such evidence appreciation does not raise substantial questions of law. The appeal was dismissed as it did not present any substantial question of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 464 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217526</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s and CIT(A)&#039;s findings, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of additions for unexplained cash credits. The Tribunal found the assessee provided necessary details, and creditors confirmed loans in their balance sheets. The appellate authorities noted the AO&#039;s reliance on surmises and lack of adverse material. The decision was based on detailed examination and sound reasoning, aligning with precedents that such evidence appreciation does not raise substantial questions of law. The appeal was dismissed as it did not present any substantial question of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>