<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 462 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217524</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods classified under CTH 7304, dismissed the mis-declaration charge, affirmed the necessity of a license for importation under the Import Trade Policy, and reduced the fine and penalty imposed on the appellant to Rs. 35,000 and Rs. 10,000 respectively due to the violation being considered minor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 462 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217524</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods classified under CTH 7304, dismissed the mis-declaration charge, affirmed the necessity of a license for importation under the Import Trade Policy, and reduced the fine and penalty imposed on the appellant to Rs. 35,000 and Rs. 10,000 respectively due to the violation being considered minor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>