<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 457 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA, HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217519</link>
    <description>The application for condonation of delay under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, seeking to condone a 726-day delay in filing the appeal, was dismissed. The court, citing principles from previous cases, emphasized the importance of timely legal remedies and the requirement for showing sufficient cause for condonation. Despite arguments of being a sick company with financial and legal issues causing the delay, the court found the reasons insufficient to justify such a substantial delay. Consequently, the application for condonation was rejected, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal as time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 457 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA, HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217519</link>
      <description>The application for condonation of delay under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, seeking to condone a 726-day delay in filing the appeal, was dismissed. The court, citing principles from previous cases, emphasized the importance of timely legal remedies and the requirement for showing sufficient cause for condonation. Despite arguments of being a sick company with financial and legal issues causing the delay, the court found the reasons insufficient to justify such a substantial delay. Consequently, the application for condonation was rejected, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal as time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>