<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 451 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217513</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held in favor of the Appellant, a distillery manufacturer, in a case concerning the reversal of credit on molasses used for manufacturing ethyl alcohol. The Tribunal determined that the Appellant&#039;s treatment of ethyl alcohol as an intermediate product was not necessary for determining duty liability, as the final products were alcohol fit for human consumption and Denatured Ethyl Alcohol. Therefore, the Appellant was allowed to waive the pre-deposit requirement and stay petition during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 451 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217513</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held in favor of the Appellant, a distillery manufacturer, in a case concerning the reversal of credit on molasses used for manufacturing ethyl alcohol. The Tribunal determined that the Appellant&#039;s treatment of ethyl alcohol as an intermediate product was not necessary for determining duty liability, as the final products were alcohol fit for human consumption and Denatured Ethyl Alcohol. Therefore, the Appellant was allowed to waive the pre-deposit requirement and stay petition during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>