<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 450 - GAUHATI  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217512</link>
    <description>A highly diluted AVP preparation was treated as retaining the essential character of AVP because, on the material relied upon, it remained a mixture of AVP and water with no additional component altering its identity. Applying the principle that mixtures and composite goods are classified by the component giving them their essential character, the Court held that dilution did not create a new commercial commodity. The product therefore fell within Entry 114 of Schedule II-C to the Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2003, rather than the residuary entry, and the clarification order imposing tax at the higher residuary rate was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2014 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 450 - GAUHATI  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217512</link>
      <description>A highly diluted AVP preparation was treated as retaining the essential character of AVP because, on the material relied upon, it remained a mixture of AVP and water with no additional component altering its identity. Applying the principle that mixtures and composite goods are classified by the component giving them their essential character, the Court held that dilution did not create a new commercial commodity. The product therefore fell within Entry 114 of Schedule II-C to the Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2003, rather than the residuary entry, and the clarification order imposing tax at the higher residuary rate was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>