<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 446 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217508</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, a company engaged in the manufacture and supply of Ready Mix Concrete (RMC), in an appeal against a Show Cause Notice proposing service tax on pumping charges collected from customers. The court held that the activity of pumping RMC at construction sites did not fall under the category of &quot;Transport of goods other than water through pipeline or other conduit&quot; service, as the appellant used special purpose vehicles, not pipelines, for transportation. The judge set aside the Order-in-Original, allowing the appeal and determining that the pumping charges were not subject to service tax under the specified category.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 446 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217508</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, a company engaged in the manufacture and supply of Ready Mix Concrete (RMC), in an appeal against a Show Cause Notice proposing service tax on pumping charges collected from customers. The court held that the activity of pumping RMC at construction sites did not fall under the category of &quot;Transport of goods other than water through pipeline or other conduit&quot; service, as the appellant used special purpose vehicles, not pipelines, for transportation. The judge set aside the Order-in-Original, allowing the appeal and determining that the pumping charges were not subject to service tax under the specified category.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>