<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 437 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217499</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that the reassessment proceedings were invalid due to being a mere change of opinion and initiated beyond the time limit without the assessee failing to disclose material facts. The technical assistance fee was correctly classified as revenue expenditure in the original assessment, with no new material justifying reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 437 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217499</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that the reassessment proceedings were invalid due to being a mere change of opinion and initiated beyond the time limit without the assessee failing to disclose material facts. The technical assistance fee was correctly classified as revenue expenditure in the original assessment, with no new material justifying reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>