<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 424 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217486</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the validity of the Show Cause Notice issued by a Preventive Officer under the Customs Act, 1962, despite the Petitioner&#039;s challenge. The Court emphasized that the Respondents should promptly make a decision based on the inputs provided by the Petitioner and a previous Division Bench ruling. The Petitioner&#039;s argument that the Notice was void ab initio due to the issuing officer not being the designated officer for assessment under the Act was rejected. The writ petition was dismissed, with the Respondent directed to inform the Petitioner of the decision at no cost, and related petitions were closed, concluding the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 424 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217486</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the validity of the Show Cause Notice issued by a Preventive Officer under the Customs Act, 1962, despite the Petitioner&#039;s challenge. The Court emphasized that the Respondents should promptly make a decision based on the inputs provided by the Petitioner and a previous Division Bench ruling. The Petitioner&#039;s argument that the Notice was void ab initio due to the issuing officer not being the designated officer for assessment under the Act was rejected. The writ petition was dismissed, with the Respondent directed to inform the Petitioner of the decision at no cost, and related petitions were closed, concluding the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>