<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 415 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217477</link>
    <description>The High Court remanded the case for fresh determination by the Tribunal, emphasizing the importance of considering subsequent developments and ordered a reevaluation of the waiver application for a just decision. The Court did not express a final opinion on the clarificatory nature of the amendment to Rule 6(6), focusing on the interpretation of the rule, the relevance of past Tribunal orders, and the impact of subsequent developments in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 22:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 415 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217477</link>
      <description>The High Court remanded the case for fresh determination by the Tribunal, emphasizing the importance of considering subsequent developments and ordered a reevaluation of the waiver application for a just decision. The Court did not express a final opinion on the clarificatory nature of the amendment to Rule 6(6), focusing on the interpretation of the rule, the relevance of past Tribunal orders, and the impact of subsequent developments in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>