https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217472 Compliance with natural justice does not end with giving a hearing; an inquiry may still be disturbed if the process is ineffective, relevant material is ignored, the evidence does not support the conclusion, or the findings are perverse or based on no evidence. On those principles, the Industrial Adjudicator was entitled to scrutinise the inquiry on merits after remand, rely on the stated defects in the evidence and procedure, and assess whether removal was justified. The adjudicator did not exceed jurisdiction, and the conclusion that the removal was unjustified was upheld. en-us Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217472 Compliance with natural justice does not end with giving a hearing; an inquiry may still be disturbed if the process is ineffective, relevant material is ignored, the evidence does not support the conclusion, or the findings are perverse or based on no evidence. On those principles, the Industrial Adjudicator was entitled to scrutinise the inquiry on merits after remand, rely on the stated defects in the evidence and procedure, and assess whether removal was justified. The adjudicator did not exceed jurisdiction, and the conclusion that the removal was unjustified was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217472