<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 393 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217454</link>
    <description>In block assessment proceedings, unsupported and unusually high sales return claims may be restricted on reasonable estimation where the books are unreliable and seized material does not support the claim; here, the return claim was confined to 5%. Out-of-book sales can justify an inference of corresponding undisclosed purchase investment where the turnover could not be achieved otherwise; the addition was sustained on that basis. Gross profit rates applied after reducing the undisclosed sales figure were upheld because no infirmity was found in the recalculation. A small standalone addition based on a seized third-party sale bill was deleted as unnecessary in light of the overall treatment of undisclosed sales.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 393 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217454</link>
      <description>In block assessment proceedings, unsupported and unusually high sales return claims may be restricted on reasonable estimation where the books are unreliable and seized material does not support the claim; here, the return claim was confined to 5%. Out-of-book sales can justify an inference of corresponding undisclosed purchase investment where the turnover could not be achieved otherwise; the addition was sustained on that basis. Gross profit rates applied after reducing the undisclosed sales figure were upheld because no infirmity was found in the recalculation. A small standalone addition based on a seized third-party sale bill was deleted as unnecessary in light of the overall treatment of undisclosed sales.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>