<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 391 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217452</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai ruled in favor of the Revenue, reinstating the addition made under Section 40A(3) by the Assessing Officer and overturning the decision of the CIT(Appeals) to delete the disallowance. The judgment emphasized the broad interpretation of &quot;expenditure&quot; under Section 40A(3) and reiterated that payments exceeding the specified limit made in cash were subject to disallowance, irrespective of the relationship with the payee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 391 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217452</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai ruled in favor of the Revenue, reinstating the addition made under Section 40A(3) by the Assessing Officer and overturning the decision of the CIT(Appeals) to delete the disallowance. The judgment emphasized the broad interpretation of &quot;expenditure&quot; under Section 40A(3) and reiterated that payments exceeding the specified limit made in cash were subject to disallowance, irrespective of the relationship with the payee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>