<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 388 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217449</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of thorough examination and documentation to support deductions under the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision and directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the research and development expenditure claim, stressing the necessity of providing complete information on purchases for proper deduction determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 388 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217449</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of thorough examination and documentation to support deductions under the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision and directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the research and development expenditure claim, stressing the necessity of providing complete information on purchases for proper deduction determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>