<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 373 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217433</link>
    <description>The appeal against penalties under the Finance Act, 1994 for short-payment of service tax on inward transportation services was successful. The Tribunal granted the benefit of Section 80 to the appellants as they promptly paid the service tax upon detection and did not contest the liability. Consequently, the penalties imposed under the Finance Act were waived, emphasizing the significance of proving bonafide mistakes and prompt tax payment to seek relief from penalties under the relevant provisions of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 373 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217433</link>
      <description>The appeal against penalties under the Finance Act, 1994 for short-payment of service tax on inward transportation services was successful. The Tribunal granted the benefit of Section 80 to the appellants as they promptly paid the service tax upon detection and did not contest the liability. Consequently, the penalties imposed under the Finance Act were waived, emphasizing the significance of proving bonafide mistakes and prompt tax payment to seek relief from penalties under the relevant provisions of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>