<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 369 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217429</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in the case, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. The judgments highlighted the importance of reliable estimates in provisions for liabilities, the need for evidence to support additions based on lower profit rates, the distinction between revenue and capital expenditures, and the timing of income recognition in cases of service charges received in advance. The decision underscored adherence to legal principles governing financial matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 16:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 369 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217429</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in the case, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. The judgments highlighted the importance of reliable estimates in provisions for liabilities, the need for evidence to support additions based on lower profit rates, the distinction between revenue and capital expenditures, and the timing of income recognition in cases of service charges received in advance. The decision underscored adherence to legal principles governing financial matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>