<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 355 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217415</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the disallowance of loss on sale of assets, remitting the matter for further verification. The delay in filing appeals by both the assessee and the Revenue was condoned, with the cross objection by the assessee being dismissed as infructuous. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deleted, resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 355 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217415</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the disallowance of loss on sale of assets, remitting the matter for further verification. The delay in filing appeals by both the assessee and the Revenue was condoned, with the cross objection by the assessee being dismissed as infructuous. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deleted, resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>