<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 350 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217410</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, addressing issues related to protective assessment, undisclosed investments, and the disallowance of interest under section 14A. The Tribunal considered the evidence presented and made adjustments to the additions made by the Assessing Officer, providing relief to the appellant on certain grounds. The additions to the appellant&#039;s income, including profit on the sale of land and undisclosed investments, were reduced after considering explanations and evidence presented, while the disallowance of interest under section 14A was overturned in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 350 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217410</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, addressing issues related to protective assessment, undisclosed investments, and the disallowance of interest under section 14A. The Tribunal considered the evidence presented and made adjustments to the additions made by the Assessing Officer, providing relief to the appellant on certain grounds. The additions to the appellant&#039;s income, including profit on the sale of land and undisclosed investments, were reduced after considering explanations and evidence presented, while the disallowance of interest under section 14A was overturned in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>