<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 339 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217397</link>
    <description>The government upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision, rejecting the applicant&#039;s claim for drawback as the exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. was deemed absolute and mandatory. The contention about the earlier order by the Commissioner (Appeals) was dismissed as it pertained to interest, not dutiability. Consequently, the revision application was denied for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 339 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217397</link>
      <description>The government upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision, rejecting the applicant&#039;s claim for drawback as the exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. was deemed absolute and mandatory. The contention about the earlier order by the Commissioner (Appeals) was dismissed as it pertained to interest, not dutiability. Consequently, the revision application was denied for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>