<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 338 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217396</link>
    <description>The Apex Court allowed the Tax Case Appeal, overturning the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision. It held that the advance fees received by the assessee should be considered assets for wealth tax assessment purposes, irrespective of the accounting method used. The Court emphasized that the value of assets should be based on estimated open market value, including rights accruing to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 338 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217396</link>
      <description>The Apex Court allowed the Tax Case Appeal, overturning the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision. It held that the advance fees received by the assessee should be considered assets for wealth tax assessment purposes, irrespective of the accounting method used. The Court emphasized that the value of assets should be based on estimated open market value, including rights accruing to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>