<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 336 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217394</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to a show-cause notice was held not maintainable where the notice related to the period after 18.4.2006 and to services covered by Section 65(55b) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Court found that the earlier notice and the authority relied on by the petitioner did not govern the impugned notice, and the jurisdictional objection was not made out. On that basis, no interference in writ jurisdiction was justified against the notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 15:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 336 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217394</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to a show-cause notice was held not maintainable where the notice related to the period after 18.4.2006 and to services covered by Section 65(55b) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Court found that the earlier notice and the authority relied on by the petitioner did not govern the impugned notice, and the jurisdictional objection was not made out. On that basis, no interference in writ jurisdiction was justified against the notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>