<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 335 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217393</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned order that denied them the utilization of CENVAT credit for excise duty payment on the final product and output service. The decision was based on the absence of a legal requirement for maintaining a separate account for input services used in manufacturing final products and providing output services, aligning with the interpretation of the CENVAT Credit Rules and a relevant precedent. The appeal was allowed, and the appellants&#039; challenge was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 17:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 335 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217393</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned order that denied them the utilization of CENVAT credit for excise duty payment on the final product and output service. The decision was based on the absence of a legal requirement for maintaining a separate account for input services used in manufacturing final products and providing output services, aligning with the interpretation of the CENVAT Credit Rules and a relevant precedent. The appeal was allowed, and the appellants&#039; challenge was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>